MetaMask vs Safe (Gnosis Safe)
Side-by-side comparison of MetaMask and Safe (Gnosis Safe). Features, chain support, security, and editorial analysis.
Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you if you sign up or make a purchase through these links. This does not influence our editorial evaluations. Learn more
| Feature | MetaMask | Safe (Gnosis Safe) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Browser Extension | Multi-Sig |
| Open Source | ||
| Chains Supported | 6 | 6 |
| ethereum | ||
| base | ||
| arbitrum | ||
| solana | ||
| bitcoin | ||
| polygon | ||
| optimism | ||
| avalanche |
MetaMask
Pros
Largest ecosystem support
Easy to set up
Open source
Huge community
Cons
No Bitcoin support
Browser-only (mobile app available)
Can be slow with many networks
Safe (Gnosis Safe)
Pros
Multi-sig security
Open source
Battle-tested
DAO standard
Cons
Not for individual users
Complex setup
Higher gas costs for transactions